Critics of the regulatory approach to cryptocurrencies in the U. S. can be heard from the former presidential candidate, Vivek Ramaswamy, who called actions of the SEC and other bodies the “anti-American” crackdown on innovation. Ramaswamy said there are simply too many rules that stifle the growth, given that the primary purpose of such assets is to operate independently of state regulation. 

To Ramaswamy this poses a threat to human freedom, and more specifically the economic freedom which he knows Americans hold dear. His critique is similar to one that many other representatives of the crypto industry hold to the opinion that the US is actively hampering its own technological progress. Because of these stringent policies like the recent ones where cases have to be filed against major exchanges, many crypto firms are under pressure to relocate to other jurisdictions. All these makes Ramaswamy opine that lack of acceptation of government to financial innovations is responsible for this. 

 Regulatory Risk Determining Innovation Cross Border 

In response to this, I highlighted Sulakshana Ramaswamy’s argument that there is a growing trend of crypto firms relocating from the United States because the laws governing the industry are not well defined. Due to the aggressive stance adopted by the SEC, most organizations have shifted their operations to locales that are friendly to digital currencies such as Switzerland and Singapore. It becoming a major concern to the U. S because moving talent and capital in this manner is viewed as losing out to other countries that use to rely on the U. S for financial technology development.  

As per Ramaswamy, what the U. S is doing is moving away from competition opportunity by focusing on restricted policies rather than offering opportunities for innovation. He also notes that unless the situation changes the United States is in a place to be left out of the increasing global cryptocurrency market. This position of Ramaswamy is attractive to those who extend support to blockchain and cryptocurrencies as the new generation Finance in its process of democratization. 

Call for Balanced Regulation 

Nevertheless, in his critique, Ramaswamy rises to the acknowledge the dictum for some form of regulation. Nonetheless, he wants the right regulation of those products, in a manner that is not detrimental to the consumer, but also benefits in the emergence of these sorts of cryptocurrencies. Thus, he says that the government is currently too aggressive, and such approaches will deter the entrepreneurs and the investors. 

He does admit that there must be a right set of rules and an independent regulatory bodies that can enable new innovations to be tested out and implemented while on the same note protecting the consumer from fraudsters and anyone conducting unlawful business. His vision presents issues similar to many blockchain enthusiasts in the United States who think that the country can maintain its leadership in such a sphere by adopting new and quite liberal view on the regulation of the industry. Cryptocurrencies according to him is something that people ought to have in any economy in order to be free but they cannot have that hence they freeze it. 

Conclusion 

Accordingly, it is shown in the article how the US crypto crackdown needs the right regulation from Vivek Ramaswamy. Based on the recent trends in the United States where the government continues to tighten screws on the crypto sector, the United States is in the danger of losing its financial revolution status.

Critics of the regulatory approach to cryptocurrencies in the U. S. can be heard from the former presidential candidate, Vivek Ramaswamy, who called actions of the SEC and other bodies the “anti-American” crackdown on innovation. Ramaswamy said there are simply too many rules that stifle the growth, given that the primary purpose of such assets […]  Read MoreNews, Crypto, Regulation, USA 

​Todayq News